Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Reid Gustafson's avatar

I will admit, I have a hard time reading "Legal Language", but based on what I can understand, if these District-109 schools are able to "take it upon themselves" to go in this direction, against what the courts decided, can't other districts take it upon themselves to ignore future Government Recommendations if they try to bring back the "Safety Mitigations"?

I grew up just outside Deerfield and went to their schools. I am so glad that we are not there now. Times were definitely different when I was there, but I genuinely had the sense, that the Deerfield community prioritizes a shallow "Signal of Virtue" over Genuine Virtue.

Overall, I find the community un-friendly, and mentally weak (Just my opinion). I still have great relationships with friends and family still living there, but this update is not helping their case.

Expand full comment
J D’A's avatar

This is a blog masked as journalism. And it is illegal posting pictures of minors taken at school without parental consent. And equally as important, it is simply not true. Why are none of the parents “quoted” using their names?

Expand full comment
20 more comments...

No posts